MobCorp Bench · products tested against their category leaders
SubX vs Openings Studio (Allegion)
Door schedule in, finished door-hardware submittal packet out, for $100, with every opening traced to its source page.
Score against Openings Studio (Allegion): 90 / 100 · tested 2026-10-29
The leader's features
| Feature | SubX | Proof |
|---|---|---|
| Read door and hardware schedules from a PDF bid set | Yes | recorded run, 7 s |
| Submittal packet output | Yes | recorded run, 163.8 s |
| Revision tracking across bulletins and addenda | Yes | recorded run, 184.1 s |
| Keying schedule | Yes | recorded run, 75.4 s |
| Hardware set authoring and editing | Yes | recorded run, 84.8 s |
| Door and frame elevations | Yes | recorded run, 208.7 s |
| Manufacturer catalogs and hardware set templates | Not yet | Openings Studio ships maker catalogs inside the tool; SubX reads what the schedule says |
| Product data / cut sheets assembled into the packet | Not yet | |
| Revit / BIM integration | Not yet | Openings Studio has a Revit plug-in |
| Quote and ordering tie-in | Not yet | Openings Studio ties specs to quotes and orders |
What SubX has that Openings Studio (Allegion) does not
- Pre-submission code check (fire, egress, keying, ADA) with citations (recorded run, 74.2 s)
Known-answer tests (1 passed)
- demo building: the four openings an AHJ would return